Hello team,
I would like to know if it's possible to do the scheme in attach?
The idea is to enable the communication between 10.1.1.4 and 10.254.254.2 by using the intermediate gateway 10.1.1.62.
I know it's unusual but it's a necessity.
Thanks for your help.
Search found 4 matches
- 23 Sep 2020, 18:07
- Forum: General questions
- Topic: Route the same LAN network through IPSec
- Replies: 1
- Views: 15717
- 13 Jul 2020, 09:56
- Forum: General questions
- Topic: 1st installation of Firewall in HA mode
- Replies: 3
- Views: 19114
Re: 1st installation of Firewall in HA mode
Hello, I come to news :) I have my HA who is working fine now, instant synchronisation when I chnge Firewall rules, to do it : 1) I delete and recreate the SYNC interface 2) I added a GW for this interface From now I don't have any more error message in the notification area. It remain 1 issue : The...
- 26 Jun 2020, 18:32
- Forum: General questions
- Topic: 1st installation of Firewall in HA mode
- Replies: 3
- Views: 19114
Re: 1st installation of Firewall in HA mode
Thanks for the quick anser.
I enabled the pfsync on both interfaces but still the same issue... I don't understand why it keep deleting the rules on the Sync interface... On monday I will bring captures of the pfsync conf...
I enabled the pfsync on both interfaces but still the same issue... I don't understand why it keep deleting the rules on the Sync interface... On monday I will bring captures of the pfsync conf...
- 19 Jun 2020, 19:25
- Forum: General questions
- Topic: 1st installation of Firewall in HA mode
- Replies: 3
- Views: 19114
1st installation of Firewall in HA mode
Hello, I'm happy to write the first post here :) [Edit] Plan has changed for a better, and easier, solution :) In attach the new scheme. I configured the High Avaliability, I hope, in the good way. I have 2 issues with it : When the master firewall send an update to the slave, it delete the rule on ...